From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31228 invoked by alias); 28 Apr 2014 15:38:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 31219 invoked by uid 89); 28 Apr 2014 15:38:23 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: e06smtp18.uk.ibm.com Received: from e06smtp18.uk.ibm.com (HELO e06smtp18.uk.ibm.com) (195.75.94.114) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 15:38:22 +0000 Received: from /spool/local by e06smtp18.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 16:38:19 +0100 Received: from d06dlp01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.20.13) by e06smtp18.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.148) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 16:38:17 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay09.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.194]) by d06dlp01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E66EC17D8062 for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 16:39:17 +0100 (BST) Received: from d06av01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.37.212]) by b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id s3SFcGdQ65536230 for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 15:38:16 GMT Received: from d06av01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d06av01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id s3SFcEow030691 for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 09:38:15 -0600 Received: from br87z6lw.de.ibm.com (sig-9-145-24-182.uk.ibm.com [9.145.24.182]) by d06av01.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id s3SFcCFF030578; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 09:38:13 -0600 From: Andreas Arnez To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" Cc: , Ulrich Weigand Subject: Re: [RFC 00/23] Regset rework preparations References: <87eh0h6bkq.fsf@br87z6lw.de.ibm.com> Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 15:38:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Maciej W. Rozycki's message of "Mon, 28 Apr 2014 16:28:36 +0100") Message-ID: <87d2g11n2z.fsf@br87z6lw.de.ibm.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 14042815-6892-0000-0000-0000089BCF5F X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2014-04/txt/msg00590.txt.bz2 On Mon, Apr 28 2014, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > On Mon, 28 Apr 2014, Andreas Arnez wrote: > >> Note that all architecture-specific changes except for S390 are >> completely untested. > > I realise you may have troubles regression testing the load of targets, > but please at least build patched GDB with the `--enable-64-bit-bfd > --enable-targets=all' configure options supplied. Without that step I > cannot approve the 06/23 MIPS part (although offhand it looks good). > Thanks for your contribution to the GDB project. Sorry, I failed to mention it, but I built after each patch with --enable-targets=all on a 64-bit system. By "untested" I meant that I didn't run the patched gdb on any targets other than s390.