From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5441 invoked by alias); 10 Jul 2014 19:16:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 5365 invoked by uid 89); 10 Jul 2014 19:16:22 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 10 Jul 2014 19:16:21 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s6AJGIn7001016 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 10 Jul 2014 15:16:18 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-95.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.95]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s6AJGGXO030139 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 10 Jul 2014 15:16:17 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Doug Evans Cc: Gary Benson , gdb-patches Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/15] Add target/symbol.h, update users References: <1404902255-11101-1-git-send-email-gbenson@redhat.com> <1404902255-11101-13-git-send-email-gbenson@redhat.com> <87bnsxdrtj.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 19:16:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Doug Evans's message of "Thu, 10 Jul 2014 11:55:09 -0700") Message-ID: <87d2dd81of.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2014-07/txt/msg00217.txt.bz2 Doug> As target/* scales up, is there a risk of the code becoming harder to Doug> read if target_ is used as a general prefix for things in target/*? Doug> Dunno. Just wondering. My long term goal is that gdb and gdbserver share the entire target stack. I think these patches further this goal. I don't find the result harder to read at all. Tom