From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8664 invoked by alias); 16 Feb 2012 19:38:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 8574 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Feb 2012 19:38:10 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 19:37:55 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q1GJbpWd013850 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 16 Feb 2012 14:37:51 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q1GJbpJX027371; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 14:37:51 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q1GJbokK003812; Thu, 16 Feb 2012 14:37:50 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC] canonical linespec and multiple breakpoints ... References: <20110505162855.GA2546@adacore.com> <201108021633.04777.pedro@codesourcery.com> <201108021900.13298.pedro@codesourcery.com> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 23:31:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Tom Tromey's message of "Fri, 18 Nov 2011 12:31:07 -0700") Message-ID: <87booyh8mq.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.93 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-02/txt/msg00336.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Tom" == Tom Tromey writes: Tom> The context for this note is this patch, which has not been checked in: Tom> http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2011-03/msg00606.html [...] Tom> I plan to check in this patch after 7.4 branches. I'm finally checking it in now. Tom