From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1443 invoked by alias); 24 May 2012 18:55:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 1431 invoked by uid 22791); 24 May 2012 18:55:37 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 May 2012 18:55:20 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q4OItHkE026813 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 24 May 2012 14:55:17 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q4OItEPO013857 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 24 May 2012 14:55:15 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Doug Evans Cc: Pierre Muller , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: New ARI warning Wed May 23 01:55:03 UTC 2012 References: <20120523015503.GA25312@sourceware.org> <4fbc9d77.0853b40a.641e.ffff90dbSMTPIN_ADDED@mx.google.com> Date: Thu, 24 May 2012 18:55:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Doug Evans's message of "Wed, 23 May 2012 07:46:21 -0700") Message-ID: <87bold8l4d.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.97 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-05/txt/msg00945.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Doug" == Doug Evans writes: Doug> We've been debating whether to move to C++, and yet we can't even move Doug> to C99. :-( In this particular case I think I somewhat prefer the sized types. That said, I wouldn't mind moving to C99. Of course, it is easy for me to say; the important question is whether anybody is building on hosts that don't have C99 compilers. Tom