From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22041 invoked by alias); 22 Jun 2012 17:38:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 21911 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Jun 2012 17:38:38 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Jun 2012 17:38:23 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q5MHc9Ex030474 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 22 Jun 2012 13:38:09 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q5MHc7iZ017925 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 22 Jun 2012 13:38:08 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: Joel Brobecker , Doug Evans , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Branching time + 1 week References: <20120511181737.GP29339@adacore.com> <20120611153435.GH2687@adacore.com> <20120621202023.GE2799@adacore.com> <20120622144641.GA4254@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20120622163224.GJ2799@adacore.com> <20120622164028.GA8457@host2.jankratochvil.net> Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 17:38:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20120622164028.GA8457@host2.jankratochvil.net> (Jan Kratochvil's message of "Fri, 22 Jun 2012 18:40:28 +0200") Message-ID: <87bokbgscg.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-06/txt/msg00723.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil writes: Jan> gnulib update also seems safe enough to me (WDYT?). I think so. Tom