From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8110 invoked by alias); 13 Nov 2012 18:34:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 8050 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Nov 2012 18:34:04 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 18:34:00 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qADIY0YZ009284 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 13 Nov 2012 13:34:00 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qADIXw2X026251 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 13 Nov 2012 13:33:59 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: RFA: handle "MiniDebuginfo" section References: <87wqxuel5k.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20121113154430.GA10305@host2.jankratochvil.net> Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 18:34:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20121113154430.GA10305@host2.jankratochvil.net> (Jan Kratochvil's message of "Tue, 13 Nov 2012 16:44:30 +0100") Message-ID: <87bof18i95.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-11/txt/msg00326.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil writes: Jan> Just giving a feedback I have never agreed with this feature, there Jan> were many mails by me (and others) with subject /minidebuginfo/i: I'm not particularly fond of it either, but my rationale for putting it into gdb is that it is shipping in Fedora, and so this patch makes the upstream gdb as capable as the Fedora gdb in this area. Tom