From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15615 invoked by alias); 10 Dec 2012 17:06:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 15590 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Dec 2012 17:05:59 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 17:05:48 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qBAH5lQC009645 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:05:47 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id qBAH5kcb012973 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 10 Dec 2012 12:05:47 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: RFC: really free pending_blocks, v2 References: <87mwy077ny.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2012 17:06:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <87mwy077ny.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (Tom Tromey's message of "Thu, 29 Nov 2012 08:25:37 -0700") Message-ID: <87boe1suqd.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-12/txt/msg00259.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Tom" == Tom Tromey writes: Tom> This is a refresh of the patch I erroneously sent to the main gdb list. I'm checking this in now. Tom