From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-99960-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 31658 invoked by alias); 27 Mar 2013 16:58:56 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 31396 invoked by uid 89); 27 Mar 2013 16:58:48 -0000
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-7.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 16:58:46 +0000
Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r2RGwj1G001774	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK)	for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Wed, 27 Mar 2013 12:58:45 -0400
Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1])	by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r2RGwi7q001199	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);	Wed, 27 Mar 2013 12:58:44 -0400
From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: Phil Muldoon <pmuldoon@redhat.com>
Cc: "gdb-patches\@sourceware.org" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [patch][python] 1 of 5 - Frame filter Python C code changes.
References: <513E56EC.2050802@redhat.com> <87vc8kzd5d.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>	<5151B6DE.80703@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 18:36:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <5151B6DE.80703@redhat.com> (Phil Muldoon's message of "Tue, 26	Mar 2013 14:55:26 +0000")
Message-ID: <87boa4hj98.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-SW-Source: 2013-03/txt/msg01025.txt.bz2

>>>>> "Phil" == Phil Muldoon <pmuldoon@redhat.com> writes:

Phil> I think a frame stash using a hash table is doable, but I think it is
Phil> overkill because I am extremely suspicious of the frame to frame
Phil> object code.

I assume you are going to fix the frame to frame object code instead?
And this will fix the 20% penalty?

I'm not totally sure it should be "instead" rather than "as well as",
since it seems like some gdb.Frame access patterns will have bad
behavior with the current stash.

Tom