From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3637 invoked by alias); 19 Apr 2013 16:53:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 3628 invoked by uid 89); 19 Apr 2013 16:53:25 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-6.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Apr 2013 16:53:25 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r3JGrNYh024762 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 19 Apr 2013 12:53:23 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r3JGrLSw001089 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 19 Apr 2013 12:53:21 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Hui Zhu Cc: gdb-patches ml Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix bug 15293 Ignore-count does not work properly with dprintf References: Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 18:40:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Hui Zhu's message of "Fri, 19 Apr 2013 17:43:03 +0800") Message-ID: <87bo9awjgf.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2013-04/txt/msg00618.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Hui" == Hui Zhu writes: Hui> This patch fix http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15293 Hui> Also I update dprintf.exp for this bug. Hui> Please help me review it. After this patch, "ignore" doesn't cause the program to stop -- this part seems correct. But it seems to me that "ignore" should make the "dprintf" not print anything at all. Otherwise, what is being ignored? Hui> +gdb_test "ignore \$bpnum 1" ".*Will ignore next crossing of breakpoint.*" I was surprised to find that this didn't interfere with the "info break" test later on. Tom