From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6071 invoked by alias); 17 Jul 2013 20:22:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 6056 invoked by uid 89); 17 Jul 2013 20:22:01 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL,RDNS_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.1 Received: from Unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Wed, 17 Jul 2013 20:22:01 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r6HKLqKx020739 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 17 Jul 2013 16:21:53 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-128.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.128]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r6HKLpKO023119 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 17 Jul 2013 16:21:52 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Hui Zhu Cc: gdb-patches ml Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix bug 15433 - GDB crashes when using agent dprintf, %s format, and an in-line string References: <87bo8edehd.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 20:22:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Hui Zhu's message of "Tue, 14 May 2013 19:14:58 +0800") Message-ID: <87bo61djj4.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2013-07/txt/msg00432.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Hui" == Hui Zhu writes: Hui> 2013-05-14 Hui Zhu Hui> PR gdb/15433 Hui> * breakpoint.c (parse_cmd_to_aexpr): Remove TRY_CATCH for gen_printf. It isn't clear to me if this patch is still pending; mostly my fault, I think, for letting patch review slide so long. But still, for clarity, could you say which dprintf patches still need review? That would help a lot. thanks, Tom