From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15990 invoked by alias); 2 Aug 2013 19:19:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 15961 invoked by uid 89); 2 Aug 2013 19:19:55 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL,RDNS_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.1 Received: from Unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Aug 2013 19:19:55 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r72JJkkZ020007 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 2 Aug 2013 15:19:46 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-128.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.128]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r72JJi1Q022913 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 2 Aug 2013 15:19:45 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] introduce parallel mode References: <1375457773-863-1-git-send-email-tromey@redhat.com> <1375457773-863-5-git-send-email-tromey@redhat.com> <834nb8yntk.fsf@gnu.org> <87mwp0c52c.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <8338qsylu4.fsf@gnu.org> <87iozoc4kf.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <831u6bzyuo.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 19:19:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <831u6bzyuo.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Fri, 02 Aug 2013 22:17:35 +0300") Message-ID: <87bo5fdho0.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2013-08/txt/msg00099.txt.bz2 Eli> Looks like it's a matter of taste in this case. If you really think @itemize is preferred here, I will comply. I'd like to understand your rationale, though. If I were writing this from scratch I would not have even considered @itemize, but rather @table. I'd like to know when I ought to use @itemize in this scenario instead. Tom