From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 50412 invoked by alias); 8 Feb 2016 18:03:03 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 50402 invoked by uid 89); 8 Feb 2016 18:03:03 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=hey, respond, ratio X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 08 Feb 2016 18:03:02 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 261B4804EE; Mon, 8 Feb 2016 18:03:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unused-10-15-17-51.yyz.redhat.com [10.15.17.51]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id u18I30WV009157 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 8 Feb 2016 13:03:00 -0500 From: Sergio Durigan Junior To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Yao Qi , Pedro Alves , keiths@redhat.com Subject: Re: RFC: branching for GDB 7.11 soon? (possibly Wed) References: <20160201030638.GG4008@adacore.com> <20160207081230.GA20874@adacore.com> X-URL: http://blog.sergiodj.net Date: Mon, 08 Feb 2016 18:03:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20160207081230.GA20874@adacore.com> (Joel Brobecker's message of "Sun, 7 Feb 2016 12:12:30 +0400") Message-ID: <87bn7rkrl7.fsf@redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2016-02/txt/msg00199.txt.bz2 On Sunday, February 07 2016, Joel Brobecker wrote: > Sergio - would you be able to give us a rough description of how > good the results are in the buildbots? Anything we should be > aware of for this release? (Thanks!) Hey Joel, Sorry for taking a long time to respond. I have not been following the BuildBot results close; there are too many racy testcases and the signal-to-noise ratio is unfortunately bad. In fact, I'm working on something that should improve this... Having said that, I will take a look at the last results and check if there's anything that deserves attention. I'll do that today, so I should have something to say by tomorrow. Cheers, -- Sergio GPG key ID: 237A 54B1 0287 28BF 00EF 31F4 D0EB 7628 65FC 5E36 Please send encrypted e-mail if possible http://sergiodj.net/