From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20244 invoked by alias); 6 Oct 2016 15:37:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 19486 invoked by uid 89); 6 Oct 2016 15:37:42 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 spammy=H*RU:cmgw4, Hx-spam-relays-external:cmgw4 X-HELO: gproxy4-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com Received: from gproxy4-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (HELO gproxy4-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com) (69.89.23.142) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with SMTP; Thu, 06 Oct 2016 15:37:32 +0000 Received: (qmail 4685 invoked by uid 0); 6 Oct 2016 15:37:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cmgw4) (10.0.90.85) by gproxy4.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 6 Oct 2016 15:37:31 -0000 Received: from box522.bluehost.com ([74.220.219.122]) by cmgw4 with id sFdU1t0022f2jeq01FdXhg; Thu, 06 Oct 2016 09:37:31 -0600 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=WvG4b7vv c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=GsOEXm/OWkKvwdLVJsfwcA==:117 a=GsOEXm/OWkKvwdLVJsfwcA==:17 a=L9H7d07YOLsA:10 a=9cW_t1CCXrUA:10 a=s5jvgZ67dGcA:10 a=CH0kA5CcgfcA:10 a=20KFwNOVAAAA:8 a=a79g8DaE5fDBTVrT39QA:9 a=_RM7nvDVKvkA:10 a=e_O65bzb51kRm2y5VmPK:22 Received: from 71-218-192-86.hlrn.qwest.net ([71.218.192.86]:55390 helo=pokyo) by box522.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.86_1) (envelope-from ) id 1bsAjf-0003j9-PN; Thu, 06 Oct 2016 09:37:27 -0600 From: Tom Tromey To: Pedro Alves Cc: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA 06/22] Introduce scoped_minimal_symbol_reader References: <1474949330-4307-1-git-send-email-tom@tromey.com> <1474949330-4307-7-git-send-email-tom@tromey.com> <8343d689-83b9-646f-6503-d4d19a3d52ba@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2016 15:37:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <8343d689-83b9-646f-6503-d4d19a3d52ba@redhat.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Thu, 6 Oct 2016 02:09:57 +0100") Message-ID: <87bmyxzdxl.fsf@tromey.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BWhitelist: no X-Exim-ID: 1bsAjf-0003j9-PN X-Source-Sender: 71-218-192-86.hlrn.qwest.net (pokyo) [71.218.192.86]:55390 X-Source-Auth: tom+tromey.com X-Email-Count: 9 X-Source-Cap: ZWx5bnJvYmk7ZWx5bnJvYmk7Ym94NTIyLmJsdWVob3N0LmNvbQ== X-SW-Source: 2016-10/txt/msg00129.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves writes: Pedro> GCC eschews using // comments, to avoid ending up with a mixbag of Pedro> styles. Maybe we should follow suit? I think // comments are just better. However, I don't really care. I can adapt the patches. Tom