From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 76461 invoked by alias); 6 May 2019 14:55:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 76451 invoked by uid 89); 6 May 2019 14:55:45 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-7.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=HX-Languages-Length:497 X-HELO: gateway24.websitewelcome.com Received: from gateway24.websitewelcome.com (HELO gateway24.websitewelcome.com) (192.185.51.251) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 May 2019 14:55:43 +0000 Received: from cm10.websitewelcome.com (cm10.websitewelcome.com [100.42.49.4]) by gateway24.websitewelcome.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 880184DCEE5 for ; Mon, 6 May 2019 09:55:39 -0500 (CDT) Received: from box5379.bluehost.com ([162.241.216.53]) by cmsmtp with SMTP id Nf1nhX9iC2PzONf1nhzepY; Mon, 06 May 2019 09:55:39 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tromey.com; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Aw21KqkQ0a4Gh8ojTuGGY9M/wB6sYxRH7U6ipzUCK4g=; b=UUxlq9abh2D/siqu3cUA+b7V8s H5+PhPv8B3fhMLTZdA5UPhBrel9XfEdNxEZk1dBnKlfIDpwvSexUR69D2+OA/KQ9/lrO5j+vBN/3k S0OjxnaIPofnyfGWs1K1cl6wF; Received: from 97-122-168-123.hlrn.qwest.net ([97.122.168.123]:41350 helo=murgatroyd) by box5379.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1hNf1n-001cwK-3H; Mon, 06 May 2019 09:55:39 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Andrew Burgess Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] gdb: Handle dynamic properties with negative values References: <124e63a9733008c0350d7f254e6dab78e72e73ea.1557088062.git.andrew.burgess@embecosm.com> Date: Mon, 06 May 2019 14:55:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <124e63a9733008c0350d7f254e6dab78e72e73ea.1557088062.git.andrew.burgess@embecosm.com> (Andrew Burgess's message of "Sun, 5 May 2019 21:57:02 +0100") Message-ID: <87bm0focnp.fsf@tromey.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2019-05/txt/msg00168.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Burgess writes: Andrew> * dwarf2loc.h (dwarf2_evaluate_property): Add signed_p parameter. Andrew> * dwarf2loc.c (dwarf2_evaluate_property): Add signed_p parameter, Shouldn't the signed-ness of the array bounds come from the DWARF? It seems fine to me for an array to have unsigned bounds, but this approach, where the caller decides the signed-ness, precludes this. Tom