Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
To: Simon Marchi <simark@simark.ca>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gdb: add an assert to cmd_list_element constructor
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2025 09:30:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bjszdu2a.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44fd10ba-0696-489f-b05b-b8f41c1496d4@simark.ca>

Simon Marchi <simark@simark.ca> writes:

> On 2025-04-13 09:08, Andrew Burgess wrote:
>> The cmd_list_element::doc variable must be non-nullptr, otherwise, in
>> `help_cmd` (cli/cli-decode.c), we will trigger an assert when we run
>> one of these lines:
>> 
>>       gdb_puts (c->doc, stream);
>> 
>> or,
>> 
>>       gdb_puts (alias->doc, stream);
>> 
>> as gdb_puts requires that the first argument (the doc string) be
>> non-nullptr.
>> 
>> Better, I think, to assert when the cmd_list_element is created,
>> rather than catching an assert later when 'help CMD' is used.
>> 
>> I only ran into this case when messing with the Python API command
>> creation code, I accidentally created a command with a nullptr doc
>> string, and only found out when I ran 'help CMD' and got an
>> assertion.
>> 
>> Built and tested on x86-64 GNU/Linux with an all-targets build; I
>> don't see any regressions, so (I hope) there are no commands that
>> currently violate this assertion.
>> ---
>>  gdb/cli/cli-decode.h | 1 +
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>> 
>> diff --git a/gdb/cli/cli-decode.h b/gdb/cli/cli-decode.h
>> index 217afbc8ca7..673cf6518d3 100644
>> --- a/gdb/cli/cli-decode.h
>> +++ b/gdb/cli/cli-decode.h
>> @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ struct cmd_list_element
>>        type (not_set_cmd),
>>        doc (doc_)
>>    {
>> +    gdb_assert (doc != nullptr);
>>      memset (&function, 0, sizeof (function));
>>    }
>>  
>> 
>> base-commit: 33d5188ab101bf414c9950ba914a128d08166105
>
> Would it make sense to add an assert that `name` isn't nullptr at the
> same time?

Good idea.  I've added this assert, and (after some testing) pushed the
patch.

Thanks,
Andrew

>
> LGTM in any case.
>
> Approved-By: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>


      reply	other threads:[~2025-04-14  8:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-13 13:08 Andrew Burgess
2025-04-13 13:48 ` Simon Marchi
2025-04-14  8:30   ` Andrew Burgess [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87bjszdu2a.fsf@redhat.com \
    --to=aburgess@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=simark@simark.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox