From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id 6516BaveZGkpTT8AWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2026 06:44:43 -0500 Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=Dj7L3K5t; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 05E5D1E070; Mon, 12 Jan 2026 06:44:43 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-25) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=5.0 tests=ARC_SIGNED,ARC_VALID,BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 Received: from vm01.sourceware.org (vm01.sourceware.org [38.145.34.32]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B8131E070 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2026 06:44:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from vm01.sourceware.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0F034BA2E34 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2026 11:44:40 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C0F034BA2E34 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key, unprotected) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=Dj7L3K5t Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4781A4BA2E35 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2026 11:42:27 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 4781A4BA2E35 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 4781A4BA2E35 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1768218147; cv=none; b=jOBXk8NUATKDHfma9axF16HYTMbRX85dTOKhn216Yfg+3YfgYqdNIHmAN1qk0g0xwW6IJzmZU2U64rppqJW2CkjtkWYAuk7Lvw9WsDVvAvNo1YAadBjrdjso+QOtCihau6WxGju0YRTuBG6vmkgAwjHtLWQrRTOgx685t8ddPYM= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1768218147; c=relaxed/simple; bh=nw1L2AM/tmzTgX0QP/OSRonW1zEyDJYATWuF3u4StQc=; h=DKIM-Signature:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=tweDyf6os7nmq99hxjTsjHoG3bq1xcW2UfHrgg12aiMmdyNUUpc2rtKTyibEpOfI1i+5RkyhrDh3N6363lK7ZWY6218rEifBI24y5k7XFT/Ogua/lJgrpnQEGeEVkgzqP4EHNXfEWnn7/ObRwV2Lq4WrqcA81s8727Pu24dq0R8= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 4781A4BA2E35 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1768218146; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=K088Ed1/8/fkQ+suRjWauWysWn7/W5LG6rE5JsFe+Hk=; b=Dj7L3K5tFb5QegXtzM1dzCN3ZidCEw12r604Fawx+pQ3fxzl5OEOsse5v4gGeLuDGIoBc1 Irj6boxpweNjRbfmpGUT64OHp+uGyHxYObS8JB3Zo8FbhVYDzKQyhs2GI6Es4V0pl3f1Ed 1cLvXnBt5Fc/a01czYuGxhUWwrV9daM= Received: from mail-wm1-f69.google.com (mail-wm1-f69.google.com [209.85.128.69]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-625-Yp6KiphcN1CaDJUxa9IkRg-1; Mon, 12 Jan 2026 06:42:10 -0500 X-MC-Unique: Yp6KiphcN1CaDJUxa9IkRg-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: Yp6KiphcN1CaDJUxa9IkRg_1768218129 Received: by mail-wm1-f69.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-47918084ac1so61021135e9.2 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2026 03:42:10 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1768218129; x=1768822929; h=mime-version:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to :from:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=K088Ed1/8/fkQ+suRjWauWysWn7/W5LG6rE5JsFe+Hk=; b=vTtYpKyHDqkH2+6AhIOTqsfvJMpG2vw292kLmWPGHstdtRF4LOx248vfvEBkEFOak9 a5B0QgMHY5HslPzVSbTGifafAom3zreIFp4+dsEt/aRo2PNm+OEAOUyazKMwYCvDAU0P 5Zr7yzy9tCr6mnHQV3kpQ42pQueY004lFQsVhNwHxvCycsjpN13TVE1WNtQN8AK+j2b8 nqMChcj8swWeQ05RsATcGjzzmxzjch8pV6x2cg2rFMNRvjBUdWLUj+RLLN62ulomO64Z 6PLgi5u6HoSvI6c9opO16lX50Vfd1Ivbf0iQ42sIGgegrJS1OWRKYPGit+g06yNFmbZW HR6w== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWa+oHZmfWr+doAjZmM54J1sZE3Qc5WhtqqbynSQgiXs3GfWj4DLtiRHNWQ2/QD6DLkk0oRUewCj5QoFw==@sourceware.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yzk5DjnD3m04WQJNEmbe8LJRYmjU0vQHzQ+O1ucgm/TN3f0I6ob rG0lBYoxoqlPJf1Vb3qW90PZ+viyUcQ6M2iWHFzqJDTSIE/qRuA7HZtZR3rY8wy/aVzVCqEIGwV yuNMDG+k1qkxwBZnv9W1BBVJGQw60pRDNu4BLwyMLBjTzs6eNURM0DigkUE//94TetfZl0dY= X-Gm-Gg: AY/fxX7LvFalbfa2PBj29CoNEbGOAOjHtuUyJiebZ9BQTav7LqHbEj1Xil6H8MfQRim LjchbYT+ZrKOxyPLGsI6zxDKVQyU0sVSwJwI4GXbL+KuT098NOFzOV/BBy5zsKc9nJ5btrxoiLK 6Qdw7aCyQzC6niif6j1aHQbpueiogijmOKebuHs9nWUA0K8N/FqCcWxSv9BXBqyiEanGa1Tgoe9 7zoqA4SZ48EAbxuKcKLo/bCDJ0hOyOc7NYmNcaavOdWeU/BS+k+Cd6U5qDGK4KYWg9vu0/ddsz6 SO6GKQquZ9X6FIieI0CgIcklBToEfC4mKUlc+K2VCSo1xMRv2ZECIwaxWHQTQjXjgoFEpGT28tI AqTYSplKGqmnT/oP+mNMFGb597wFH X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:8b43:b0:477:1bb6:17e5 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-47d84b3983dmr212895565e9.30.1768218129288; Mon, 12 Jan 2026 03:42:09 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFlDMO4wipd3Xvxo1uiL5Zab2cvcdX3EBbaQqty0vi0nT6pdu8tH1bujWniO81JiaHwg1RkLQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:8b43:b0:477:1bb6:17e5 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-47d84b3983dmr212895225e9.30.1768218128903; Mon, 12 Jan 2026 03:42:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (13.81.93.209.dyn.plus.net. [209.93.81.13]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-47ecf6a5466sm68403845e9.11.2026.01.12.03.42.08 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 12 Jan 2026 03:42:08 -0800 (PST) From: Andrew Burgess To: Tom Tromey Cc: Tom de Vries , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] [gdb] Fix heap-buffer-overflow in args_complete_p In-Reply-To: <877bttqoiv.fsf@tromey.com> References: <20260103145559.2722584-1-tdevries@suse.de> <874iozygr7.fsf@redhat.com> <7beac4be-7924-48b5-804b-6400efd02834@suse.de> <875x9dwvhe.fsf@redhat.com> <87tswxv555.fsf@redhat.com> <877bttqoiv.fsf@tromey.com> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2026 11:42:07 +0000 Message-ID: <87bjizukfk.fsf@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-MFC-PROC-ID: uLCY4_LU96Moz8pGvUsDhCdAh1968z0CRulMS0JIM9w_1768218129 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces~public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Tom Tromey writes: > Andrew> Maybe one day we'll move off the mailing list model. > > What would it take? I cannot imagine a time in the near future when everyone involved in GDB would agree to such a change. But maybe if the majority of the largest contributors wanted the change then we could figure something out? > > What I'd like ideally is that landing patches be done via the UI. > That way we could have some guarantee that what lands is what is > reviewed. I don't think this is possible with the current setup though. This would be my ideal too. This opens the door real automated pre-commit testing. There are setups which do this sort of thing with a mailing list (if I remember correctly), but it still relies on people manually checking prior to pushing. > For my part I think my main worry is that I'd miss patches that I want > to be involved in. True. But at least for me, that's already the case as.... > Anyway it seems clear that the current approach isn't working extremely > well. I don't know about anyone else but I have >3500 "pending" > messages in gdb-patches, some dating back years. And probably more than > half of those are actual unreviewed patches. ...I too have a huge backlog of unread patches. I am trying to do more reviews, but I just cannot read patches fast enough. Anyway, I haven't investigated, but my ideal system would be managed via a web UI, but could still send users email when new patches are posted. That way, if folks find it easier to track their todo list via email, they could still do that. Thanks, Andrew