Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
To: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: Luis <luis.machado.foss@gmail.com>,
	Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gdb/testsuite: make gdb.dwarf2/dw2-empty-inline-ranges.exp work when ASLR can't be disabled
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2026 14:14:11 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bji2dkng.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260205204257.422150-1-simon.marchi@efficios.com>

Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com> writes:

> A colleague that goes by the name "Luis Machado" reported a failure when
> running gdb.dwarf2/dw2-empty-inline-ranges.exp.  After investigation, we
> found that the conditions for the test to fail are:
>
>  - running in an environment where GDB can't disable address space
>    randomization (such as in a container where that capability is
>    removed)
>
>  - a toolchain generating position-independent executables
>
> The test does a first run to grab the addresses of a few labels defined
> in the source file.  It then crafts the DWARF using these addresses.
> And then it does a second run for the actual test stuff.
>
> When the executable is PIE and ASLR is active, then the addresses in
> both runs don't agree, which the test doesn't expect.
>
> It is possible to emulate the failure by inserting some:
>
>     gdb_test_no_output "set disable-randomization off"
>
> after both "prepare_for_testing" calls.  The (first) failure then
> manifests as:
>
>     FAIL: gdb.dwarf2/dw2-empty-inline-ranges.exp: dwarf_version=4: empty_loc=start: entry_pc_type=empty: stopped at entry-pc
>
> This test compares the expected stop PC "entry_pc" with the actual stop
> PC "pc".  In my example run, they were indeed different:
>
>     pc       = 0x5603ec67a159
>     entry_pc = 0x55baba6a9159
>
> The simplest way to fix this, which this patch implements, is to use
> "nopie" when building the binaries.  I don't think this affects the
> effectiveness of the test.
>
> Also, in the first run, it is longer necessary to run the inferior
> before grabbing the addresses, they are going to be the same with a
> non-PIE executable.  So remove that.

Thanks for fixing this.  LGTM.

Approved-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>


Thanks,
Andrew


  reply	other threads:[~2026-02-06 14:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-02-05 20:42 Simon Marchi
2026-02-06 14:14 ` Andrew Burgess [this message]
2026-02-06 14:56   ` Simon Marchi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87bji2dkng.fsf@redhat.com \
    --to=aburgess@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=luis.machado.foss@gmail.com \
    --cc=simon.marchi@efficios.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox