From: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
To: Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: Luis <luis.machado.foss@gmail.com>,
Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gdb/testsuite: make gdb.dwarf2/dw2-empty-inline-ranges.exp work when ASLR can't be disabled
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2026 14:14:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bji2dkng.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260205204257.422150-1-simon.marchi@efficios.com>
Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@efficios.com> writes:
> A colleague that goes by the name "Luis Machado" reported a failure when
> running gdb.dwarf2/dw2-empty-inline-ranges.exp. After investigation, we
> found that the conditions for the test to fail are:
>
> - running in an environment where GDB can't disable address space
> randomization (such as in a container where that capability is
> removed)
>
> - a toolchain generating position-independent executables
>
> The test does a first run to grab the addresses of a few labels defined
> in the source file. It then crafts the DWARF using these addresses.
> And then it does a second run for the actual test stuff.
>
> When the executable is PIE and ASLR is active, then the addresses in
> both runs don't agree, which the test doesn't expect.
>
> It is possible to emulate the failure by inserting some:
>
> gdb_test_no_output "set disable-randomization off"
>
> after both "prepare_for_testing" calls. The (first) failure then
> manifests as:
>
> FAIL: gdb.dwarf2/dw2-empty-inline-ranges.exp: dwarf_version=4: empty_loc=start: entry_pc_type=empty: stopped at entry-pc
>
> This test compares the expected stop PC "entry_pc" with the actual stop
> PC "pc". In my example run, they were indeed different:
>
> pc = 0x5603ec67a159
> entry_pc = 0x55baba6a9159
>
> The simplest way to fix this, which this patch implements, is to use
> "nopie" when building the binaries. I don't think this affects the
> effectiveness of the test.
>
> Also, in the first run, it is longer necessary to run the inferior
> before grabbing the addresses, they are going to be the same with a
> non-PIE executable. So remove that.
Thanks for fixing this. LGTM.
Approved-By: Andrew Burgess <aburgess@redhat.com>
Thanks,
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-06 14:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-05 20:42 Simon Marchi
2026-02-06 14:14 ` Andrew Burgess [this message]
2026-02-06 14:56 ` Simon Marchi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87bji2dkng.fsf@redhat.com \
--to=aburgess@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=luis.machado.foss@gmail.com \
--cc=simon.marchi@efficios.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox