From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28508 invoked by alias); 1 Mar 2012 09:03:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 28498 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Mar 2012 09:03:45 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from relay1.mentorg.com (HELO relay1.mentorg.com) (192.94.38.131) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Mar 2012 09:03:29 +0000 Received: from nat-dem.mentorg.com ([195.212.93.2] helo=eu2-mail.mgc.mentorg.com) by relay1.mentorg.com with esmtp id 1S31v6-0006vt-IL from Thomas_Schwinge@mentor.com ; Thu, 01 Mar 2012 01:03:28 -0800 Received: from feldtkeller.schwinge.homeip.net ([172.30.64.112]) by eu2-mail.mgc.mentorg.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Thu, 1 Mar 2012 10:03:27 +0100 From: Thomas Schwinge To: Kevin Buettner Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] [SH] Prologue skipping if there is none In-Reply-To: <20120229171247.12db9412@mesquite.lan> References: <87pqdgciho.fsf@schwinge.name> <20120215075413.1313f7fa@mesquite.lan> <20120215165907.33f2e9a6@mesquite.lan> <8739aad9il.fsf@schwinge.name> <20120216182544.36b41a1b@mesquite.lan> <87mx8da3b9.fsf@schwinge.name> <20120220162029.2082b6a1@mesquite.lan> <87wr7c7aop.fsf@schwinge.name> <20120224144657.36bbd09f@mesquite.lan> <87r4xd528y.fsf@schwinge.name> <20120229171247.12db9412@mesquite.lan> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.9-101-g81dad07 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 09:03:00 -0000 Message-ID: <87aa404rsc.fsf@schwinge.name> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-03/txt/msg00009.txt.bz2 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-length: 878 Hi Kevin! On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 17:12:47 -0700, Kevin Buettner wrot= e: > On Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:05:01 +0100 > Thomas Schwinge wrote: > > As for the other advancements that you reported, do you have any > > additional patches in your tree; see the questions in my 2012-02-21 > > email, Message-ID: <8762f09stp.fsf@schwinge.name>. >=20 > It turns out that I do. It's unrelated to prologue analysis. I'll > post it separately in a few minutes. (I'll CC you on it.) >=20 > It's a small patch that I thought I had removed from my tree. Sorry > about the noise caused by that patch. Ah good, and no problem -- so at least we know there's no magic involved causing the differences betweeen our two's testing setups. > Thanks for all of your work on this matter. Thanks to your for helping, reviewing, etc.! Gr=C3=BC=C3=9Fe, Thomas --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-length: 489 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPTztTAAoJENuKOtuXzphJeJwH/3tm2rgsbLmEWRHJ0b/JqY6d I5W8QCLl9+BV0yIGkjsTGhR4nZZF7BH88PLi7cFMZgWe2S+OufAhbVDLfll77Nhw lopssHFm/iPUQrIbw/s0FwzSe8r6XMRQkDjYTIdA7DZWmKRc4EsQw2W2GMGN8qsv BJPNzqryKDRNgb9q6anrckLGVlcdtNYEnP2AgLDwvdlSJZGzCHGNUH+Id8OLMiXX zFsmX9/41LYd+tRnZmsOeIL3KwnlMX7r8h9AUrwv/50iLjLx6OLrN0/7HccyHVwH WQ9/G5YI0Xnrm0Z3tTTcgUnK0H+0b9zA2fAIugjGl9w24K3WNddse52177Zfbzk= =ectO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--