From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5412 invoked by alias); 28 Mar 2012 18:55:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 5404 invoked by uid 22791); 28 Mar 2012 18:55:37 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,TW_SM,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 28 Mar 2012 18:55:24 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q2SItMNW027803 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 28 Mar 2012 14:55:22 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q2SItLkA023984 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 28 Mar 2012 14:55:21 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: asmwarrior Cc: Keith Seitz , "gdb-patches\@sourceware.org ml" Subject: Re: [RFA 1/2] Linespec rewrite (update 2) References: <4F70F8F7.503@redhat.com> <4F711BCB.7070905@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 18:55:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <4F711BCB.7070905@gmail.com> (asmwarrior@gmail.com's message of "Tue, 27 Mar 2012 09:45:47 +0800") Message-ID: <87aa30y2qu.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.94 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-03/txt/msg00961.txt.bz2 >>>>> ">" == ext asmwarrior writes: >> I'm testing your line spec rewrite branch, it works great. >> Now, I'm using your branch, and the result is: >> [debug]> break "E:/code/cb/test_code/DebugDLLTest/TestDLL/dllmain.cpp:29" >> [debug]No source file named >> E:/code/cb/test_code/DebugDLLTest/TestDLL/dllmain.cpp. >> [debug]Breakpoint 4 >> ("E:/code/cb/test_code/DebugDLLTest/TestDLL/dllmain.cpp:29") pending. >> You can see, the third line, it does have a tail quote. >> I believe adding the tail quote is the right direction. Also, I can >> easily adjust the regex to: I think so too; and also I think that we should not support reliance on the contents or formatting of error messages in a front end. This sort of thing is why MI exists. Tom