From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 351 invoked by alias); 10 Sep 2012 15:44:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 342 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Sep 2012 15:44:45 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 15:44:28 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q8AFiRhQ008568 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 10 Sep 2012 11:44:27 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q8AFiQlF019622 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 10 Sep 2012 11:44:26 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: "Andrew Burgess" Cc: "gdb-patches\@sourceware.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH]: ptype of pointer to typedef References: <50447C4A.8010009@broadcom.com> Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 15:44:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <50447C4A.8010009@broadcom.com> (Andrew Burgess's message of "Mon, 3 Sep 2012 10:45:46 +0100") Message-ID: <87a9wxevc5.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-09/txt/msg00118.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Burgess writes: Andrew> The test case builds on an existing test that was marked as Andrew> xfail in a few cases, I've extended the xfail to cover the new Andrew> case I've added, but I have no way to check if this is the right Andrew> thing to do or not, I'm happy to change the patch if anyone has Andrew> an opinion. I would just drop the xfails. If they are needed, somebody with the affected environment can write them. The patch is ok with that change. Andrew> +gdb_test "ptype pv_char_array" "type = (|unsigned )char Andrew> \\(\\*\\)\\\[0?\\\]" Andrew> + Your email got wrapped somehow. Tom