From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17838 invoked by alias); 26 Sep 2012 20:01:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 17829 invoked by uid 22791); 26 Sep 2012 20:01:36 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 20:01:24 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q8QK1HJe011446 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 26 Sep 2012 16:01:18 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q8QK1GD6023520 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 26 Sep 2012 16:01:16 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: "Pierre Muller" Cc: Subject: Re: [RFA] Add missing gdb_bfd.h includes References: <18620.4427075156$1348564388@news.gmane.org> Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 20:01:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <18620.4427075156$1348564388@news.gmane.org> (Pierre Muller's message of "Tue, 25 Sep 2012 11:12:32 +0200") Message-ID: <87a9wcy2no.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-09/txt/msg00605.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Pierre" == Pierre Muller writes: Pierre> Is this OK? Yes, thank you. Pierre> As usual, Pierre> 1) I am not sure about correct wording for ChangeLog What you wrote is fine. Pierre> 2) I never really understood the ordering logic (or to Pierre> be more precise, if there is an ordering logic) of C headers Pierre> in C source files, thus I inserted them more or less randomly... There should not be many strong ordering dependencies in gdb, aside from the rule that defs.h has to come first. I wouldn't worry about it in general. Tom