From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3658 invoked by alias); 22 Jan 2013 15:47:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 3648 invoked by uid 22791); 22 Jan 2013 15:47:40 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 15:47:32 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r0MFlVIK022219 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 10:47:31 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r0MFlUkU011632 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 22 Jan 2013 10:47:31 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Testsuite regression for gdb.gdb/selftest.exp [Re: RFC: call bfd_init] References: <87pq1bsq82.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <87hama30le.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20130121203948.GA27977@host2.jankratochvil.net> <87ehhe1d09.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 15:47:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <87ehhe1d09.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (Tom Tromey's message of "Mon, 21 Jan 2013 13:45:26 -0700") Message-ID: <87a9s1z0bx.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-01/txt/msg00529.txt.bz2 Tom> Haha, of course. Tom> I will fix it tomorrow. Here is what I am checking in. Tom> selftest.exp fails randomly for me so it is in my list to ignore. Tom> I guess I will try to diagnose this as well. It is due to differences in the builds. A comment in selftest.exp warns about this, but the test names still depend on the details of the build. Gross. Anyway I will stop ignoring it now. Tom 2013-01-22 Tom Tromey * gdb.gdb/selftest.exp (do_steps_and_nexts): Handle bfd_init call. Index: gdb.gdb/selftest.exp =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.gdb/selftest.exp,v retrieving revision 1.32 diff -u -r1.32 selftest.exp --- gdb.gdb/selftest.exp 1 Jan 2013 06:41:22 -0000 1.32 +++ gdb.gdb/selftest.exp 22 Jan 2013 15:46:10 -0000 @@ -150,6 +150,10 @@ set description "next over textdomain PACKAGE" set command "next" } + -re ".*bfd_init ..;.*$gdb_prompt $" { + set description "next over bfd_init" + set command "next" + } -re ".*VEC_cleanup .cmdarg_s.*$gdb_prompt $" { set description "next over cmdarg_s VEC_cleanup" set command "next"