From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15616 invoked by alias); 10 Jan 2014 17:12:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 15603 invoked by uid 89); 10 Jan 2014 17:12:21 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 10 Jan 2014 17:12:20 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s0AHCImm029959 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 10 Jan 2014 12:12:18 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-85.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.85]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s0AHCGgP030334 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 10 Jan 2014 12:12:17 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Yao Qi Cc: Subject: Re: [PATCH] rearrange struct value to save memory References: <1389294182-982-1-git-send-email-tromey@redhat.com> <52CF6966.1060405@codesourcery.com> Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 17:12:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <52CF6966.1060405@codesourcery.com> (Yao Qi's message of "Fri, 10 Jan 2014 11:30:46 +0800") Message-ID: <87a9f37ocv.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2014-01/txt/msg00288.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Yao" == Yao Qi writes: Yao> It does save some memory shown by the result of 'make perf-check' on Yao> an amd64-linux box. I don't see any time performance regression Yao> in the test. It is indeed a good improvement! Thanks Yao. I'm sorry to report that it didn't even occur to me to try perf-check. I'll give it a run here just so I can see it do its magic :) Tom