From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19067 invoked by alias); 22 Jan 2014 16:07:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 19055 invoked by uid 89); 22 Jan 2014 16:07:57 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Jan 2014 16:07:56 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s0MG7rC5005624 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 22 Jan 2014 11:07:53 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-85.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.85]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s0MG7pjl010068 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 22 Jan 2014 11:07:52 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: reject merges on gdb release branches? References: <20140122051133.GB4762@adacore.com> Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 16:07:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20140122051133.GB4762@adacore.com> (Joel Brobecker's message of "Wed, 22 Jan 2014 09:11:33 +0400") Message-ID: <87a9eo9ezs.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2014-01/txt/msg00862.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Joel" == Joel Brobecker writes: Joel> We are already rejecting merge commits on branch master. Joel> I propose we do the same for the gdb-7.7 branch, and generally Joel> speaking on all GDB release branches, just to make sure that Joel> people don't accidently push a merge when they meant to cherry-pick. Joel> Thoughts? Yes, it's a good idea. Tom