Re: [RFA 5/8] Allow defining a user command inside a user command

Tom Tromey
2018-04-24T23:24:55Z

>>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> writes:

Pedro> I'd vote for splitting those up:

I agree, I did this.

Pedro> Isn't this conflating top-level "define" command, with interactive
Pedro> input? I imagine that a top-level "define" command in e.g., gdbinit will
Pedro> considered "interactive call" according to the above, while in truth,
Pedro> it's not really interactive, according to FROM_TTY.

Yes, I've re-worded this.

Tom