From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 76758 invoked by alias); 27 Sep 2019 19:10:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 76750 invoked by uid 89); 27 Sep 2019 19:10:22 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-6.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=accident X-HELO: gateway32.websitewelcome.com Received: from gateway32.websitewelcome.com (HELO gateway32.websitewelcome.com) (192.185.145.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 19:10:21 +0000 Received: from cm12.websitewelcome.com (cm12.websitewelcome.com [100.42.49.8]) by gateway32.websitewelcome.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBA986B2B1 for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 14:10:18 -0500 (CDT) Received: from box5379.bluehost.com ([162.241.216.53]) by cmsmtp with SMTP id DvdCi7q7mW4frDvdCipAqp; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 14:10:18 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tromey.com; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Cjn/38rb3Oa0W9JsNzoSXs8zF+eYoAauVJWjwb2bZSg=; b=tZRONwKB9cDVJCr1yxtzcUdDzn OQUID7ZdS9isJrNWS3Lz5SnbAoiBMCpGBEtxfZ03MadtWPTD/mgqw70G9ArbAfIaTBE1zah/ZVert 46IFL5QkT68PpsdkUg3hC2pzS; Received: from 71-218-73-27.hlrn.qwest.net ([71.218.73.27]:59236 helo=murgatroyd) by box5379.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iDvdC-001juS-L0; Fri, 27 Sep 2019 14:10:18 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Pedro Alves Cc: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC 00/17] Merge event loop implementations References: <20190224165153.5062-1-tom@tromey.com> <3ae5ab8e-c219-6510-bb54-b30c1cf2d074@redhat.com> <87mueqslhn.fsf@tromey.com> <52b71425-e839-99fa-5045-8aaa02eafaef@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2019 19:10:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <52b71425-e839-99fa-5045-8aaa02eafaef@redhat.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Fri, 27 Sep 2019 14:53:09 +0100") Message-ID: <87a7apeesm.fsf@tromey.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2019-09/txt/msg00559.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves writes: Pedro> What's the plan for gdb_fildes_t then? It's been a while since I wrote this series, so I don't really recall all the details, and I don't have time to dig into it today :( However, my hope was that unifying on the gdb approach would be good enough. And, while debugging on Windows this week, I happened (I forgot to look before starting, so it's kind of a goofy accident) to use this event unification branch. I used gdb and also tried gdbserver, and as far as I can tell, everything worked fine. So, my view is that the current patch series is probably roughly ok. Tom