From: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
To: Stephan Rohr <stephan.rohr@intel.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, aburgess@redhat.com, tom@tromey.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] gdb: Fix assertion in 'value_primitive_field'
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 11:52:59 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a5lt19fo.fsf@tromey.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240327152208.8321-2-stephan.rohr@intel.com> (Stephan Rohr's message of "Wed, 27 Mar 2024 08:22:08 -0700")
>>>>> Stephan Rohr <stephan.rohr@intel.com> writes:
> From: "Rohr, Stephan" <stephan.rohr@intel.com>
> GDB asserts that the data location of a value's field with a dynamic
> data location is resolved when fetching the field's value in
> 'value_primitive_field'. This assertion was hit because of bogus DWARF
> generated by the Intel Fortran compiler. While that compiler should fix
> the DWARF, we prefer GDB to error out here instead, e.g. to allow the
> user to continue debugging other parts of the program.
I have been trying to understand this patch for a while but I really
don't. Could you explain it in more detail, preferably in the commit
message?
> + DW_TAG_variable {
> + {DW_AT_name var_a_invalid_location}
> + {DW_AT_type :$struct_label}
> + {DW_AT_location {
> + DW_OP_addr [gdb_target_symbol var_a]
> + DW_OP_deref
> + DW_OP_stack_value
> + } SPECIAL_expr}
> + }
For example, I don't understand what is invalid about this.
It's weird for sure, but why is gdb's failure to evaluate it anything
other than a bug somewhere else in gdb?
In the "valid" case I see the field type being resolved. Why doesn't
this happen in the invalid case?
> + error (_("cannot read %s, expected an already resolved data "
> + "location."), arg_type->field (fieldno).name ());
This error shouldn't have a trailing ".", it makes the output look
weird:
$1 = {data = <error reading variable: cannot read data, expected an already resolved data location.>
Tom
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-16 17:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-27 15:22 [PATCH v3 0/1] " Stephan Rohr
2024-03-27 15:22 ` [PATCH v3 1/1] " Stephan Rohr
2024-04-16 17:52 ` Tom Tromey [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87a5lt19fo.fsf@tromey.com \
--to=tom@tromey.com \
--cc=aburgess@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=stephan.rohr@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox