From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id M/+NFWWnF2kenQIAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 14 Nov 2025 17:04:21 -0500 Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=comcast.net header.i=@comcast.net header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20190202a header.b=t8XghSdl; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 45BBA1E0B8; Fri, 14 Nov 2025 17:04:21 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-25) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=5.0 tests=ARC_SIGNED,ARC_VALID,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 Received: from server2.sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 199541E04C for ; Fri, 14 Nov 2025 17:04:20 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8255C3858C50 for ; Fri, 14 Nov 2025 22:04:19 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 8255C3858C50 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=comcast.net header.i=@comcast.net header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20190202a header.b=t8XghSdl Received: from resqmta-c2p-570217.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-c2p-570217.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fd00:56::7]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1790A3858D1E for ; Fri, 14 Nov 2025 22:02:59 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 1790A3858D1E Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=comcast.net Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=comcast.net ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 1790A3858D1E Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=2001:558:fd00:56::7 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1763157784; cv=none; b=B9DSjRmHzxJfKSKrHzHzjlO8BwDa5UYKLrz5nVQWhh9uIcX1WwwiZ7c9I3CuesUwxg83L6MjtVmGyNL8iYy+ljKwa/DS/c5ZTX+aULqgG7iISknJaDfYf4Hjhyy9hynPTiKPzHY859JME472Q+tXK31R+tPC4QakcH0OHv0C2O4= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1763157784; c=relaxed/simple; bh=iYl+X+0EWhPvmveArA8TTAAkfUk5PQrxh1c2mhNKyxY=; h=DKIM-Signature:Mime-Version:Subject:From:Date:Message-Id:To; b=BAjIGGXHClAwZCqLaKe3k3y5ZuDzJRqvMOvKh0r4VqR4K/OEMdoB2cKVM46gYOpP9xQvK1xd3IgqFF1HHZvZxQXI+7JMb/LvHQ/t5iWnBEhxJsByv0+DHAg0uPbwXe6uLdWF/KiaS3B9FkfYNpxELGFy9aMnbokaIuSWvja3Jdk= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 1790A3858D1E Received: from resomta-c2p-555954.sys.comcast.net ([96.102.18.234]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 256/256 bits) (Client did not present a certificate) by resqmta-c2p-570217.sys.comcast.net with ESMTPS id K1iAvo5wzxt2TK1sfvbFGe; Fri, 14 Nov 2025 22:02:57 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=20190202a; t=1763157778; bh=8QQXe+Dho8HlD70IO3VL+2mx1fGy4u8/wX98z/dOKyA=; h=Received:Received:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:Date: Message-Id:To:Xfinity-Spam-Result; b=t8XghSdlvXs/QEAcqSiTZ5vG/kA7E8zs2ILFYsdB1dRdgbW2WpC6oWSYqVmjOSS8j oF+KPt0YV25QwKqi8q4JnROM9dGhb+jP1PPN9HUz4Rn1QFy6Z2AYUm/2IAYgX/t9vj QkfvtRsyxdFVLzV4j+XCOQwJdI6J2FoGb41nZfTLgOW5Pu6+776NPKSyp1zMC9y3Zo AzDFGhjF2z3KLJRcGdJdv983b2BZSF+TYzt5H8kSqMPubS2eCudcj+dsu4NIZIF3h0 QgHP9Gn0QXeJBjpk862eO+ExkzTwO1yQqVI06IHAMB4yEuzGGvLjDDF2ZePBGpPo6X im20Qknam4u8w== Received: from smtpclient.apple ([73.60.223.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 256/256 bits) (Client did not present a certificate) by resomta-c2p-555954.sys.comcast.net with ESMTPSA id K1sevbmrYpvz1K1sev6NFv; Fri, 14 Nov 2025 22:02:57 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3826.700.81\)) Subject: Re: [PATCH] Mark Pascal as case-insensitive From: Paul Koning In-Reply-To: <87ecq0whxx.fsf@tromey.com> Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2025 17:02:45 -0500 Cc: Tom de Vries , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <87AA3F28-5E27-49F2-A2C6-D14BA082A830@comcast.net> References: <20251113162811.616219-1-tromey@adacore.com> <87ecq0whxx.fsf@tromey.com> To: Tom Tromey X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3826.700.81) X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4xfDRyYgdJtEnJmHCNl5k0aQjFXemP80gDVxBPyBtTXXuVCbwZvjkqD88cUPLQULMOXsFs8G5BG48/TTjK2FKn2VXCjY9C4NjnEj7KciZsJEbtDiL/iiYX vgH+OMf/jM6NfR4S+JQnn2iyqDuNZyX47HcHO8AZlheVblr4M9ofB+L321zDq6R3w9S5El4WXoiBUqKVlAVyNNksLKwSN3MEqcufMge1PTqpwWmgFogjCnAI K8UY+NdYGMKHowgnrUjaUXJw3Huwm6Cxo05D//nzlt8= X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces~public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org > On Nov 14, 2025, at 2:08=E2=80=AFPM, Tom Tromey = wrote: >=20 > Tom> FWIW, I just found DW_AT_identifier_case: > Tom> ... > Tom> <0>: Abbrev Number: 1 (DW_TAG_compile_unit) > Tom> DW_AT_name : > Tom> ../../../../src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.pascal/hello.pas > Tom> <3f> DW_AT_producer : Free Pascal 3.2.2 2025/09/10 > Tom> <5c> DW_AT_comp_dir : > Tom> /data/vries/gdb/leap-16-0/build/gdb/testsuite/ > Tom> <8b> DW_AT_language : 9 (ANSI Pascal) > Tom> <8c> DW_AT_identifier_case: 3 (case_insensitive) > Tom> <8d> DW_AT_stmt_list : 0 > Tom> <91> DW_AT_low_pc : 0x401090 > Tom> <99> DW_AT_high_pc : 0x401150 > Tom> ... > Tom> which enables a finer granularity. We currently don't support = this, > Tom> but I'm not sure if that's a relevant feature. >=20 > I also didn't know about this. >=20 > We could probably handle this in gdb, maybe by enhancing the > canonicalization step, though other approaches are possible. >=20 > Tom Is the purpose of that mechanism to allow individual symbols to be case = sensitive, or not? Neat, but where would that be used? paul