From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-14042-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 13064 invoked by alias); 7 Apr 2002 21:08:29 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 13056 invoked from network); 7 Apr 2002 21:08:28 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ?217.215.34.175?) (217.215.34.175)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 7 Apr 2002 21:08:28 -0000
Received: (qmail 30621 invoked by uid 1000); 7 Apr 2002 21:09:43 -0000
To: Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: RDI on OpenBSD
References: <200204041103.MAA11981@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com>
From: dne@mayonnaise.net (Daniel =?iso-8859-1?q?N=E9ri?=)
Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2002 14:08:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <200204041103.MAA11981@cam-mail2.cambridge.arm.com> (Richard
 Earnshaw's message of "Thu, 04 Apr 2002 12:03:05 +0100")
Message-ID: <878z7zjjvs.fsf@nowhere.mayonnaise.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) Emacs/21.2
 (i386-unknown-openbsd3.0)
Organization: A safe european home
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00263.txt.bz2

Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com> writes:

> So we really do need that test for __NetBSD__ there.

Yep, it seems you're right. Anyway, I'll be happy if either __unix__
or __OpenBSD__ gets added to the condition in question.


Regards,
   --Daniel


-- 
Daniel Neri
dne@mayonnaise.net