From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26340 invoked by alias); 13 Jun 2012 19:37:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 26188 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Jun 2012 19:37:03 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,TW_DW,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 19:36:45 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q5DJaj1r009776 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 15:36:45 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q5DJai4f031568 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 13 Jun 2012 15:36:45 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [0/12] RFC: support for 'dwz -m' References: <87y5o1lhrt.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 19:37:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <87y5o1lhrt.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (Tom Tromey's message of "Tue, 05 Jun 2012 12:45:26 -0600") Message-ID: <878vfrxaur.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-06/txt/msg00432.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Tom" == Tom Tromey writes: Tom> I'm posting this series as an RFC. I intend to check it in, just not Tom> yet -- it is too large, IMO, to go in just before 7.5, and also we're Tom> hoping to get some official DWARF constants assigned beforehand (see Tom> patch #1). Finally, this series needs a couple of links to Tom> documentation, which I think isn't ready yet. I'm going to post a new version of this series. I dropped patch #1, because Jakub put the equivalent patch into gcc and src already. It has a link to the DWARF proposal: http://www.dwarfstd.org/ShowIssue.php?issue=120604.1&type=open Of course, because of this, the patch numbers all change, leading to general confusion. I plan to handle this by sending follow-ups to the most recent version of the patches. Also, I'm only planning to repost the patches that have changed -- just the last 3. Tom> I've regression tested the series using plain 'dwz -m', but not Tom> multifile compression in conjunction with .gdb_index (the dwz change Tom> here isn't ready yet). I will do this testing before committing. I did this and there are no regressions as compared to a test suite run using just .gdb_index. (.gdb_index has a regression against a plain test run.) Tom