From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19745 invoked by alias); 15 Oct 2012 20:01:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 19734 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Oct 2012 20:01:57 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 20:01:47 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q9FK1kjH016801 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 15 Oct 2012 16:01:46 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q9FK1jAk016883 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 15 Oct 2012 16:01:46 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Keith Seitz Cc: "gdb-patches\@sourceware.org ml" Subject: Re: [RFA] Add support for class typedefs/add missing derivation.exp tests References: <506CD89F.4040101@redhat.com> <87ipaba59u.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <507C6910.7060009@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 20:01:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <507C6910.7060009@redhat.com> (Keith Seitz's message of "Mon, 15 Oct 2012 12:50:40 -0700") Message-ID: <878vb7a4ie.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-10/txt/msg00241.txt.bz2 Keith> Ha. Yeah. It doesn't (yet)... Those should actually be two Keith> separate patches. Keith> That's what I get for posting a little cleanup patch (on which a Keith> subsequent patch relies). Sorry. It's no problem. The patch is ok as-is. Thanks for explaining. Tom