From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32620 invoked by alias); 15 Mar 2013 16:43:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 32426 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Mar 2013 16:43:25 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 16:43:16 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r2FGhC6x029467 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 15 Mar 2013 12:43:12 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r2FGh9I8011099 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 15 Mar 2013 12:43:10 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Yao Qi Cc: Pierre Muller , Subject: Re: Compilation failure for mingw64 target (was New ARI warning Fri Mar 15 02:02:12 UTC 2013 in -D 2013-03-15-gmt) References: <20130315020212.GA23545@sourceware.org> <5142E409.5090109@codesourcery.com> <002901ce2162$414d7530$c3e85f90$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> <51430063.2060007@codesourcery.com> <5143335C.2010902@codesourcery.com> Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 16:52:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <5143335C.2010902@codesourcery.com> (Yao Qi's message of "Fri, 15 Mar 2013 22:42:36 +0800") Message-ID: <878v5o1un6.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-03/txt/msg00674.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Yao" == Yao Qi writes: Yao> Here is the updated one, in which 'WORDS_BIGENDIAN' is checked to get Yao> the host-endianness. This macro is used somewhere else in GDB, so looks Yao> it is a right way. This part is ok. Yao> /* Create DIRNAME. */ Yao> - if (mkdir (dirname, S_IRWXU | S_IRGRP | S_IXGRP | S_IROTH | S_IXOTH) Yao> - && errno != EEXIST) Yao> +#ifdef USE_WIN32API Yao> + ret = mkdir (dirname); Yao> +#else Yao> + ret = mkdir (dirname, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IXUSR); Yao> +#endif I think S_IRUSR, S_IWUSR,and S_IXUSR are generally ok. At least, I see them unprotected in remote-fileio.c. So I think a simpler patch here would suffice, and would be cleaner besides. thanks, Tom