From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25074 invoked by alias); 22 Jul 2013 16:25:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 25050 invoked by uid 89); 22 Jul 2013 16:25:33 -0000 X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_WL,RDNS_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.1 Received: from Unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.84/v0.84-167-ge50287c) with ESMTP; Mon, 22 Jul 2013 16:25:05 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r6MGOvsO019060 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 22 Jul 2013 12:24:57 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-128.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.128]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r6MGOtKA005491 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 22 Jul 2013 12:24:56 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Doug Evans Cc: jan.kratochvil@redhat.com, gdb-patches Subject: Re: Runtime regression for gdb.base/reread.exp & co. [Re: [RFA] Remove target_section.bfd] References: <20130718105435.GA26949@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20130718163310.GA14833@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20968.34352.845515.406613@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com> Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 16:25:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20968.34352.845515.406613@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com> (Doug Evans's message of "Thu, 18 Jul 2013 17:20:00 -0700") Message-ID: <878v0y7eaw.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2013-07/txt/msg00507.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Doug" == Doug Evans writes: Doug> The change was added here: Doug> http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2012-07/msg00742.html Doug> Tom: Can you remember the reproducer for the issue fixed by this patch? This is all I have: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2011-12/msg00493.html Basically, I tripped across a case where gdb assumed that BFDs were not shared. Doug> Note that all calls to remove_target_sections pass the bfd from "key": I didn't understand this, but reading the patch made it all clear. It looks good to me, thanks. Tom