From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4306 invoked by alias); 27 Nov 2013 23:58:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 4293 invoked by uid 89); 27 Nov 2013 23:58:55 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RDNS_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from Unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 23:58:54 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rARNwkSg002159 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 27 Nov 2013 18:58:46 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-124.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.124]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rARNwiBC018280 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 27 Nov 2013 18:58:45 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Doug Evans Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] mt set per-command remote-packets on|off References: Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 00:47:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Doug Evans's message of "Wed, 27 Nov 2013 14:43:49 -0800") Message-ID: <878uw9z9aj.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2013-11/txt/msg00866.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Doug" == Doug Evans writes: Doug> It adds "mt set per-command packet on|off", and is helpful Doug> in examining remote serial protocol issues. I'm curious what happens in target-async mode with a background command. I suppose the stats are associated with the subsequent command? Also, not your problem I guess, but it this seems like this will do the wrong thing when there are multiple remote targets, since the accounting is per-remote. If you really want it to be per-command it seems that you might as well just make the stats be globals, not in remote_state. Doug>+ If we're communicating over a flaky channel and have to resent packets Typo, "resend". Tom