From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25698 invoked by alias); 6 Jan 2014 21:07:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 25689 invoked by uid 89); 6 Jan 2014 21:07:49 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 21:07:49 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s06L617b027405 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 6 Jan 2014 16:06:02 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-85.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.85]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s06L60Hk005938 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 6 Jan 2014 16:06:01 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Doug Evans Cc: Hui Zhu , Sergio Durigan Junior , gdb-patches ml , Edjunior Barbosa Machado , Nick Clifton Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove gdb_bfd_stash_filename to fix crash with fix of binutils/11983 References: <52C8358B.7080101@mentor.com> <52C97EC0.3080807@mentor.com> <87k3edseia.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <52CA8A7F.7090907@mentor.com> Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2014 21:07:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Doug Evans's message of "Mon, 6 Jan 2014 09:12:43 -0800") Message-ID: <878uuslt1j.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2014-01/txt/msg00101.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Doug" == Doug Evans writes: Doug> I would prefer a new bfd routine to set the file name. Doug> Then *it* is responsible for freeing the old name. Doug> Any reason to not go that route? It seems like a reasonable cleanup to me. Tom