From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 7139 invoked by alias); 10 Jul 2014 19:35:37 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 7127 invoked by uid 89); 10 Jul 2014 19:35:36 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Thu, 10 Jul 2014 19:35:36 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s6AJZVjT032223 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 10 Jul 2014 15:35:31 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-95.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.95]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s6AJZTvZ025927 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 10 Jul 2014 15:35:30 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Doug Evans Cc: Yao Qi , gdb-patches Subject: Re: [PATCH OBV] Remove any_running References: <1403157035-13558-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> <87ha2p81ru.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 19:35:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Doug Evans's message of "Thu, 10 Jul 2014 12:21:20 -0700") Message-ID: <878uo180se.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2014-07/txt/msg00219.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Doug" == Doug Evans writes: Doug> [See, the community really is pedantic about its attention to rules.] I am not "the community", I'm a person. Please address me as such. I'm not sure what to say about this other than there is no rule here, I am expressing my opinion. You may consider it pedantic, but I on the other hand consider it just common sense not to push in code without a use. Doug> Otherwise, I wouldn't have checked this in ... Doug> No worries. Patch reverted. All you had to do was mention the patch. It was not mentioned in your email, and I think it's unreasonably to expect that I, or anyone, would remember some other series from 3 months ago. Tom