From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-146849-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 70103 invoked by alias); 26 Apr 2018 20:45:59 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 70094 invoked by uid 89); 26 Apr 2018 20:45:59 -0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=_alignof, _Alignof
X-HELO: gateway22.websitewelcome.com
Received: from gateway22.websitewelcome.com (HELO gateway22.websitewelcome.com) (192.185.46.225) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 20:45:57 +0000
Received: from cm11.websitewelcome.com (cm11.websitewelcome.com [100.42.49.5])	by gateway22.websitewelcome.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E078C171	for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 15:45:55 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from box5379.bluehost.com ([162.241.216.53])	by cmsmtp with SMTP	id Bnm7fZ2AbA3CSBnm7feYCR; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 15:45:55 -0500
X-Authority-Reason: nr=8
Received: from 97-122-176-117.hlrn.qwest.net ([97.122.176.117]:59174 helo=pokyo)	by box5379.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256)	(Exim 4.89_1)	(envelope-from <tom@tromey.com>)	id 1fBnm7-002HCp-Gn; Thu, 26 Apr 2018 15:45:55 -0500
From: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
To: Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>
Cc: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>,  gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFA 2/6] Handle alignof and _Alignof
References: <20180424152222.8053-1-tom@tromey.com>	<20180424152222.8053-3-tom@tromey.com>	<bed9b13b-1ac2-7b06-d72c-002555c9e4cc@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2018 20:45:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <bed9b13b-1ac2-7b06-d72c-002555c9e4cc@redhat.com> (Pedro Alves's	message of "Tue, 24 Apr 2018 20:17:33 +0100")
Message-ID: <878t997l31.fsf@tromey.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source-L: No
X-Exim-ID: 1fBnm7-002HCp-Gn
X-Source-Sender: 97-122-176-117.hlrn.qwest.net (pokyo) [97.122.176.117]:59174
X-Source-Auth: tom+tromey.com
X-Email-Count: 4
X-Source-Cap: ZWx5bnJvYmk7ZWx5bnJvYmk7Ym94NTM3OS5ibHVlaG9zdC5jb20=
X-Local-Domain: yes
X-SW-Source: 2018-04/txt/msg00541.txt.bz2

>>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> writes:

Pedro> What do we do with _Alignof(void)?  We treat sizeof(void) == 1,
Pedro> like gcc, so I assume the _Alignof will return 1 too instead
Pedro> of erroring out.

_Alignof(void) is accepted by gcc but alignof(void) is rejected by g++.
I've made the test do the former.

Tom