From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20195 invoked by alias); 12 Jan 2019 22:41:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 20179 invoked by uid 89); 12 Jan 2019 22:41:48 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=interest X-HELO: gateway22.websitewelcome.com Received: from gateway22.websitewelcome.com (HELO gateway22.websitewelcome.com) (192.185.46.224) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sat, 12 Jan 2019 22:41:46 +0000 Received: from cm17.websitewelcome.com (cm17.websitewelcome.com [100.42.49.20]) by gateway22.websitewelcome.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F27D63CB2 for ; Sat, 12 Jan 2019 16:41:44 -0600 (CST) Received: from box5379.bluehost.com ([162.241.216.53]) by cmsmtp with SMTP id iRyKghBK690oniRyKgAZsN; Sat, 12 Jan 2019 16:41:44 -0600 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tromey.com; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=USi7RwpV5NAKWL0LCInW0mygHAmDPnH3NZv3LL6KyRg=; b=KJNtqRQEb02LEk3U5tQpiYaYSY y8DPUn9eJ2lA+Efx29QsZIE3MFvaruCAt+T/kPpld+8/Vu7R/t8HBRfcjmKpG8BG7+rnCf6HNOIWH bRsfShdsaVqPLhg1IcZb/hfZP; Received: from 75-166-72-210.hlrn.qwest.net ([75.166.72.210]:39548 helo=bapiya) by box5379.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from ) id 1giRyK-003Gee-Lo; Sat, 12 Jan 2019 16:41:44 -0600 From: Tom Tromey To: Tom Tromey Cc: Andrew Burgess , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] remove some cleanups using a cleanup function References: <20190109033426.16062-1-tom@tromey.com> <87fttxx45t.fsf@tromey.com> Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2019 22:41:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <87fttxx45t.fsf@tromey.com> (Tom Tromey's message of "Sat, 12 Jan 2019 08:54:22 -0700") Message-ID: <878szpv6qg.fsf@tromey.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2019-01/txt/msg00301.txt.bz2 Andrew> How do you think this compares to your original patches? Any interest Andrew> in this approach? Tom> Yes, let's do this. I happened to stumble across the message for commit 9bcb1f1630b05594fa86bfd017639cfcc966b11c today. It references http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2014/n4189.pdf ... which proposes a generic scope guard class along these lines. So, now I wonder if we should just reuse that paper's contents, but in the gdb namespace. Tom