From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id jee/F4FcoF9kGAAAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 02 Nov 2020 14:22:41 -0500 Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 53EEF1F08B; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 14:22:41 -0500 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on simark.ca X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B47241E58D for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 14:22:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A3BB385802D; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 19:22:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail-out.m-online.net (mail-out.m-online.net [212.18.0.9]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E102B385802D for ; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 19:22:36 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org E102B385802D Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux-m68k.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=whitebox@nefkom.net Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CQ2qb6Rfkz1qs3D; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 20:22:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.70]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CQ2qb6ChLz1qtZW; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 20:22:35 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.70]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xbMQfmmVz1aj; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 20:22:35 +0100 (CET) X-Auth-Info: 4nDUyi159HDrQqyn7j6xrd/9CKvdYQXDJrO/7+bNqqrxd8Z/BbNDd04YXbeb/Bmy Received: from igel.home (ppp-46-244-190-239.dynamic.mnet-online.de [46.244.190.239]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 20:22:35 +0100 (CET) Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BC4F72C368D; Mon, 2 Nov 2020 20:22:34 +0100 (CET) From: Andreas Schwab To: Gary Benson Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix gdb.dwarf2/clztest.exp with Clang References: <1604336929-1338-1-git-send-email-gbenson@redhat.com> <87pn4vzlvt.fsf@igel.home> <20201102191402.GA6162@blade.nx> X-Yow: Now I'm concentrating on a specific tank battle toward the end of World War II! Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2020 20:22:34 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20201102191402.GA6162@blade.nx> (Gary Benson's message of "Mon, 2 Nov 2020 19:14:02 +0000") Message-ID: <878sbjzhqd.fsf@igel.home> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Gary Benson via Gdb-patches Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces@sourceware.org Sender: "Gdb-patches" On Nov 02 2020, Gary Benson wrote: > A comment in that .S file indicated it was originally generated > using GCC (via gcc -dA -S -g -O2 clztest.c -o clztest.S) but that > was 2011, so maybe things changed. Modern compilers don't emit .eh_frame contents manually, but use cfi directives. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1 "And now for something completely different."