From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from simark.ca by simark.ca with LMTP id 2/CPH8prO2bHqwoAWB0awg (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 08 May 2024 08:10:50 -0400 Authentication-Results: simark.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=H36v5YBx; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by simark.ca (Postfix, from userid 112) id 743B61E0C1; Wed, 8 May 2024 08:10:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (server2.sourceware.org [8.43.85.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by simark.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6139D1E030 for ; Wed, 8 May 2024 08:10:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from server2.sourceware.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14013384AB47 for ; Wed, 8 May 2024 12:10:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18C8B385E836 for ; Wed, 8 May 2024 12:10:25 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org 18C8B385E836 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org 18C8B385E836 Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1715170226; cv=none; b=qYnb71h8SbIwrSl1VLdZA5u7NDSEa9RRHo//0jAsO3jCN6p46OqBlJizPhqOh50SRpXrJMj3avA9UgRVzyxpAmDBpx3wf3yw9ChDZ4yewQc77XWSuVu04dORRjf8Vfdm+1Rro6WU3eQbjh0Dy5oqrj/XADD3mQmhudvfuZl4gMc= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1715170226; c=relaxed/simple; bh=yzMJh6y75aRRLRJk3Gec3X3X4ILhYrbHRnUNhZlgSks=; h=DKIM-Signature:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=ol8uttrBHkL3IUIOO9yMIQ3epkLvlQTlAAKB61k80w5f8qdbvAKgksoBPZIwytvwFi9PrdqB2QRkbKHGTvUEvR/UNnpIW6bKF8Pf9psLJLblGXGsPnsxw0Y2pQ9AWhmDK1TgpORZpzk6i/S5L8FLiksS8GzJ43RUOoNoxU1FKOs= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1715170224; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=308Vx0nAq1oIIuGTgrUBdMW6RIhvRjHvhyc5+24H/XM=; b=H36v5YBxivn6Q9wMyxsnA+qYvgT0dxbmeAMMzCPApXESpiQk5sBCuIE0CGNhp7LoJkA4V1 oBTow42NLtTtb1PxFB1mg9UDgbeqyFdhq2Y7nUloMm0gjzh8CIgEtblxaC+ZcR/3aqDoha RyWH5QlHSIi+6EuSB+K4CeG9iPfw/fg= Received: from mail-wr1-f71.google.com (mail-wr1-f71.google.com [209.85.221.71]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-241-ycmmJ2rnO0e1fAvq3pu3_w-1; Wed, 08 May 2024 08:10:23 -0400 X-MC-Unique: ycmmJ2rnO0e1fAvq3pu3_w-1 Received: by mail-wr1-f71.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-34d99cc6c3dso2602696f8f.3 for ; Wed, 08 May 2024 05:10:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1715170222; x=1715775022; h=mime-version:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=308Vx0nAq1oIIuGTgrUBdMW6RIhvRjHvhyc5+24H/XM=; b=ClJMVNFASmhh5+tFsPfcGti/r9hz9s9Bq6sIBUWYRBosvbLlAbz/iq1yHI6KiMqMoC 3pGFxs/EL2xlLP+VJqsNhmWNS9dzRWQVH9qpxSy6bJQpSon+H/FCGX+fC4W/KeC+UPMP J66ImcRmAnJpDggZ68NEP9NUhlnVRrMpB0YNUo9kcucZiirs5vCbJHLcYiHymq05PXym bqO4C1eDiTZU2dtg4u9oJqMioHRxPA0NmaPFkS8iDvOVFOtEnU9it0QIRHsiCENQC0Gn t+yCp+cb/dmI2ngyO1OtYGq1soTREel+TO6eMhmM7ei83p3RsEMvUoLt8fchWtDLXhYD 6lew== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUKYM2PnRMy5gUc+XFz/H6y5jHaC2SAFYwQGL6iGk9iUTN0lf+4r4inwKA06GQj3IVWtQl2Es8HnY54u0ApS+dCW6oC8FBnxUhw3Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwkFO61A/Y4TJQDAHEUYCadneimEqgk1G3Pi1tbmBkuNunJn9Rh 28OPtvmSRSz3kePYj9LzUc2ptX5sNmFDnBzIW96f+XzgAOB3dGDarA9fjzTuLa6BFSBZrYZsKSb M/5s43JcyrG+U+Xqdj3U3+KCfbo1sLkdICdD1SIRQrfX8aSGLcKyLX6M36oQ= X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4d4c:0:b0:343:39ef:53b0 with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-34fcade24b0mr1525238f8f.24.1715170222120; Wed, 08 May 2024 05:10:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFr9VxrTCICRHIaYOYVAi6wtRm7pO1GASnGH1lOhzAWpbWXGNkhMJcEYOoqx9UQOTcy1MotUw== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4d4c:0:b0:343:39ef:53b0 with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-34fcade24b0mr1525220f8f.24.1715170221577; Wed, 08 May 2024 05:10:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([31.111.84.240]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h11-20020adfe98b000000b00343d1d09550sm15234964wrm.60.2024.05.08.05.10.21 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 08 May 2024 05:10:21 -0700 (PDT) From: Andrew Burgess To: Tiezhu Yang , binutils@sourceware.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Cc: Jim Wilson , Jeff Johnston , Kevin Buettner Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gdb: Remove Itanium (IA-64) architecture In-Reply-To: <20240508092911.24823-3-yangtiezhu@loongson.cn> References: <20240508092911.24823-1-yangtiezhu@loongson.cn> <20240508092911.24823-3-yangtiezhu@loongson.cn> Date: Wed, 08 May 2024 13:10:20 +0100 Message-ID: <878r0ktsgj.fsf@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: gdb-patches@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.30 Precedence: list List-Id: Gdb-patches mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: gdb-patches-bounces+public-inbox=simark.ca@sourceware.org Tiezhu Yang writes: > The Itanium architecture is obsolete, after the upstream Linux kernel > commit cf8e8658100d ("arch: Remove Itanium (IA-64) architecture"), the > IA-64 port has been removed from the Linux kernel, so also remove the > IA-64 specific code from gdb. On the GDB side, I'm not aware of the IA64 code causing any significant issues for anyone, so I don't see any particular rush to delete it, especially if there's still interest in IA64 support. If someone knows of problems that exist then that would for sure change my opinion. But without a strong motivation, my vote would be hold off for a while longer. Thanks, Andrew