Re: New ARI warning Wed May 23 01:55:03 UTC 2012

Doug Evans
2012-06-25T19:59:48Z

On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com> wrote:
>> Tom Tromey wrote:
>> How about we flip the switch to C99 for 7.6?
>
> Sounds good to me. Do we want to be exclusive, rather than inclusive?
> In other words, say: The following C99 constructs are allowed, and
> maintain that list, rather that allow all of C99, and then list
> the features not allowed. I understand that some features are still
> not implemented (or portable?).

Which would be easier?
It feels like listing the allowed constructs would work best.
[We can still add text to list/discuss what's disallowed, but separately.]