From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31350 invoked by alias); 11 Sep 2012 20:42:27 -0000 Received: (qmail 31339 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Sep 2012 20:42:26 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.7 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 20:42:13 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q8BKgBTm031453 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 11 Sep 2012 16:42:11 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q8BKg97F025614 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 11 Sep 2012 16:42:09 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Jan Kratochvil , Doug Evans , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [3/3] RFC - optional patch to restore DW_AT_data_member_location References: <87628cfbg2.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <20120824165249.GA11867@host2.jankratochvil.net> <20120902150440.GA24162@adacore.com> Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 20:42:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20120902150440.GA24162@adacore.com> (Joel Brobecker's message of "Sun, 2 Sep 2012 11:04:40 -0400") Message-ID: <877gs08f6m.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-09/txt/msg00181.txt.bz2 Jan> The use case is that if not upstreamed I will have to continue Jan> carrying on the patch up to date with HEAD for many further years Jan> for compatibility with gfortran-4.1 in RHEL-5.y. Joel> Personally, I think it is potentially helpful to have it in the FSF Joel> tree unless it causes problems. I can certainly see someone upgrading Joel> their GDB from source, while still using the compiler provided by the Joel> system. I'll include the patch when I commit this series. Tom