From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: RFC: implement 'info proc mappings' for core files
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 21:48:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877gpzloii.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <871ug8nnqw.fsf__31325.5512774505$1352124723$gmane$org@fleche.redhat.com> (Tom Tromey's message of "Mon, 05 Nov 2012 07:11:19 -0700")
Sergio> Wow, I totally forgot about this feature. In fact, I thought Ulrich's
Sergio> patch had already implemented it! If I knew it hadn't been implemented,
Sergio> I would have sent my patches again :-). Shame on me.
Tom> I totally forgot there were patches in this area, too :(
Tom> I will dig them up and look at them.
Well, ouch. Here are the threads I found
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2008-12/msg00322.html
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2011-11/msg00101.html
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2011-12/msg00018.html
If you look through the monthly archives there are some detached
sub-threads as well.
I found it pretty hard to find the conclusion. IIUC what actually went
in was a patch to have gdbserver read the remote /proc entries and serve
them up verbatim, for parsing locally.
For those opposed to "info proc" working on core files, if you are still
opposed, let me know. I guess I can resurrect Sergio's "info core"
command.
Tom
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-11-05 21:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-11-02 18:42 Tom Tromey
2012-11-03 3:45 ` Sergio Durigan Junior
[not found] ` <m3vcdnjqn5.fsf__5583.70666481114$1351914377$gmane$org@redhat.com>
2012-11-05 14:11 ` Tom Tromey
[not found] ` <871ug8nnqw.fsf__31325.5512774505$1352124723$gmane$org@fleche.redhat.com>
2012-11-05 21:48 ` Tom Tromey [this message]
2012-11-20 20:05 ` Tom Tromey
2012-11-20 20:16 ` Eli Zaretskii
2012-12-03 9:29 ` Jan Kratochvil
2012-12-03 17:26 ` Tom Tromey
2012-12-14 15:17 ` Tom Tromey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877gpzloii.fsf@fleche.redhat.com \
--to=tromey@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=sergiodj@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox