From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21421 invoked by alias); 18 Dec 2012 16:08:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 21406 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Dec 2012 16:08:09 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Dec 2012 16:07:34 +0000 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qBIG7XuE026964 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 18 Dec 2012 11:07:33 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id qBIG7VYl013764 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 18 Dec 2012 11:07:32 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: William Douglas , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] print_frame add info References: <87ehiocel0.fsf@intel.com> <20121218083252.GA8054@host2.jankratochvil.net> Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 16:08:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20121218083252.GA8054@host2.jankratochvil.net> (Jan Kratochvil's message of "Tue, 18 Dec 2012 09:32:52 +0100") Message-ID: <877goftkcc.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-12/txt/msg00636.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil writes: Jan> * IMO it should be before the function name so that one can Jan> copy-paste it as a linespec to "break" and other commands. But Jan> linespec should be able to parse "objectname:funcname" which it Jan> currently cannot. Jan> And I was not sure how well will one parse "objectname:funcname" in Jan> linespec, Keith Seitz is rewriting the linespec parser somehow. I don't think the linespec change should be a prerequisite to changing how the stack frame is displayed. I agree with your other points though. Tom