From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2587 invoked by alias); 25 Jan 2013 16:41:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 2365 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Jan 2013 16:41:06 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Jan 2013 16:40:30 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r0PGeOEO024410 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 25 Jan 2013 11:40:29 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r0PGeNoD005007 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 25 Jan 2013 11:40:23 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Siva Chandra Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Possible cleanup - remove unused argument 'lax' to find_overload_match References: Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 16:41:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Siva Chandra's message of "Fri, 25 Jan 2013 05:45:04 -0800") Message-ID: <877gn1i5c8.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.91 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-01/txt/msg00631.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Siva" == Siva Chandra writes: Siva> The 'lax' argument to find_overload_match is not used. I do not know Siva> the history as to why this argument is present, but the attached patch Siva> removes this argument. It seems it was already that way in 6.8. I didn't dig any deeper than that. The patch is ok, thanks. Tom