From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-105381-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 5886 invoked by alias); 17 Sep 2013 18:38:36 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
Received: (qmail 4994 invoked by uid 89); 17 Sep 2013 17:33:25 -0000
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 17:33:25 +0000
Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none
X-Virus-Found: No
X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com
Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r8HHXEhD031931	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);	Tue, 17 Sep 2013 13:33:14 -0400
Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-63.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.63])	by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r8HHXCYA004630	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);	Tue, 17 Sep 2013 13:33:13 -0400
From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: Raunaq 12 <raunaq12@in.ibm.com>
Cc: David Edelsohn <dje.gcc@gmail.com>, Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>,        GDB Patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>,        Mark Kettenis <mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl>,        Ulrich Weigand <Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFA/ppc-aix] fix thread support breakage
References: <CAGWvnynVeLt6F-QREsP_CtQvwvtZgwqHxtcS6pn58LMf=AX=GA@mail.gmail.com>	<OF91B6D42F.B0CFCB9C-ON65257BC5.004284AA-65257BC5.0042F553@in.ibm.com>	<CAGWvnynzsNL--qPhHOhqZ912A4M9ZpXtT2JbjW4EHRodEXAF9Q@mail.gmail.com>	<20130822233234.GA13292@adacore.com>	<20130823004837.GC5221@adacore.com>	<CAGWvnymjyCc9vFbh4+eNdr2mdxJYU0=LFC1-itC38SDKfRaG-w@mail.gmail.com>	<20130823133415.GD5221@adacore.com>	<CAGWvnyna5R2AR0imAC4W+aCJXPFjwPm+45yP9VOgkO68T7sF7w@mail.gmail.com>	<OFC7611E7B.F19F366D-ON65257BE2.003745A0-65257BE2.00386093@in.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 18:38:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <OFC7611E7B.F19F366D-ON65257BE2.003745A0-65257BE2.00386093@in.ibm.com>	(Raunaq's message of "Tue, 10 Sep 2013 15:44:19 +0530")
Message-ID: <877gefz73b.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-SW-Source: 2013-09/txt/msg00526.txt.bz2

>>>>> ">" == Raunaq 12 <raunaq12@in.ibm.com> writes:

>> David, my intention was to run test cases for all the combinations
>> that you have mentioned above. Since we use XLC (AIX native compiler)
>> to compile the test cases, the entire test bucket does not run very
>> smoothly.

I guess this supplies a future to-do list :-)

>> In fact it is a very cumbersome process. So the test failures would
>> have been over looked by me.

The standard thing to do is run the test suite twice, once before your
patch and once after, and compare the results.

Tom