From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25756 invoked by alias); 7 Nov 2013 21:31:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 25747 invoked by uid 89); 7 Nov 2013 21:31:23 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_50,RDNS_NONE,SPAM_SUBJECT,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from Unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 07 Nov 2013 21:31:22 +0000 Received: from int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.24]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rA7LVD1s018413 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 7 Nov 2013 16:31:13 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn-113-94.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.94]) by int-mx11.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rA7LVBcT011919 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 7 Nov 2013 16:31:12 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: Samuel Bronson , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Resurrect gdb-add-index as a contrib script References: <20131107195712.GA25547@host2.jankratochvil.net> Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 21:54:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20131107195712.GA25547@host2.jankratochvil.net> (Jan Kratochvil's message of "Thu, 7 Nov 2013 20:57:12 +0100") Message-ID: <877gcjucf4.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2013-11/txt/msg00214.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil writes: >> It also occurs to me that people might want to use fragments of this >> in their build systems, so it might be better to use the simple >> permissive license from >> ; >> would that be okay? Jan> I do not see a reason to make such exception although it is Tom's Jan> script so it is more up to him. I find such a possible request can Jan> be considered if it ever appears. It's fine by me. Jan> On Mon, 04 Nov 2013 20:33:20 +0100, Samuel Bronson wrote: >> Oops. My last email was supposed to say something about "gdb-add-index >> foo" not working when foo had no / in it. This is the problem which >> the "this" in the next part was meant to refer to. Jan> I did not find too clear from the archives why Tom has removed the script. Jan> I found only Jan> Re: [patch] gdb-add-index tweaks Jan> https://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2010-09/msg00133.html There's a thread in an earlier month. Doug had objections to it that I could not address in a timely way. I don't recall if contrib existed at the time; I agree this is an ok solution. Tom