From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1877 invoked by alias); 3 Mar 2014 13:33:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 1809 invoked by uid 89); 3 Mar 2014 13:33:27 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: e06smtp16.uk.ibm.com Received: from e06smtp16.uk.ibm.com (HELO e06smtp16.uk.ibm.com) (195.75.94.112) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPS; Mon, 03 Mar 2014 13:33:26 +0000 Received: from /spool/local by e06smtp16.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 13:33:22 -0000 Received: from d06dlp03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.20.15) by e06smtp16.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.146) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 13:33:19 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06relay12.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.109.197]) by d06dlp03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8491F1B08061; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 13:33:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av11.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av11.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.37.252]) by b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id s23DX71k524796; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 13:33:07 GMT Received: from d06av11.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by d06av11.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id s23DXI7e002654; Mon, 3 Mar 2014 06:33:19 -0700 Received: from sandifor-thinkpad.stglab.manchester.uk.ibm.com (sandifor-thinkpad.manchester-maybrook.uk.ibm.com [9.174.219.98]) by d06av11.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVin) with ESMTP id s23DXIFJ002628 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 3 Mar 2014 06:33:18 -0700 From: Richard Sandiford To: binutils@sourceware.org Mail-Followup-To: binutils@sourceware.org,gdb-patches@sourceware.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, rsandifo@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: copyright dates in binutils (and includes/) References: <20140227045011.GC14922@bubble.grove.modra.org> <20140227132551.GO4348@adacore.com> <20140228085652.GI14922@bubble.grove.modra.org> <20140228130844.GA4893@adacore.com> <20140303034451.GD5934@bubble.grove.modra.org> <20140303041639.GA26922@bubble.grove.modra.org> Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 13:33:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20140303041639.GA26922@bubble.grove.modra.org> (Alan Modra's message of "Mon, 3 Mar 2014 14:46:39 +1030") Message-ID: <877g8bxv8h.fsf@sandifor-thinkpad.stglab.manchester.uk.ibm.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-TM-AS-MML: disable X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER x-cbid: 14030313-3548-0000-0000-00000844E33E X-SW-Source: 2014-03/txt/msg00035.txt.bz2 Alan Modra writes: > On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 02:14:51PM +1030, Alan Modra wrote: >> I'll post update-copyright.py separately. Thanks for doing this, looks good to me FWIW. I don't know whether we want to keep a single script for both GCC and binutils+gdb or fork, but probably separate copies makes sense. As far as including include/ goes: the only reason that didn't happen for gcc/ was because I didn't want to sort out which files were GCC- specific and whether binutils, GCC or GDB was the master for each file. So if we do your option (b) I think we should do (c) as well. I suppose that means syncing GCC's include/ with binutils+gdb and then adding GCC's include/ to the list of "approved" directories. I'm happy to try that if it sounds OK. (Maybe after the 4.9 release, not sure.) Thanks, Richard