From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 70245 invoked by alias); 27 Feb 2015 12:59:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 70226 invoked by uid 89); 27 Feb 2015 12:59:46 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: sasl.smtp.pobox.com Received: from pb-sasl1.int.icgroup.com (HELO sasl.smtp.pobox.com) (208.72.237.25) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 12:59:45 +0000 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEAE438924; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 07:59:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from pb-sasl1.int.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E744C38923; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 07:59:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from rusty (unknown [88.160.190.192]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3A7EE38921; Fri, 27 Feb 2015 07:59:41 -0500 (EST) From: Andy Wingo To: Alexander Smundak Cc: Pedro Alves , Doug Evans , gdb-patches Subject: Re: [PATCH] JIT read_debug_info callback takes target symfile addr References: <87d250yaqq.fsf@igalia.com> <871tlduk0a.fsf@igalia.com> <54EF083A.9000800@redhat.com> <871tlcq1in.fsf@igalia.com> Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2015 12:59:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Alexander Smundak's message of "Thu, 26 Feb 2015 13:50:15 -0800") Message-ID: <877fv35x38.fsf@igalia.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 7EFEF22E-BE80-11E4-84BA-B058D0B8C469-02397024!pb-sasl1.pobox.com X-SW-Source: 2015-02/txt/msg00816.txt.bz2 Hi, On Thu 26 Feb 2015 22:50, Alexander Smundak writes: > How set are you on implementing the unwinder for V8 in Guile rather > than in Python? Having unwinders for different mixed language > environment might help reveal API deficiencies sooner. Which mix -- target or extension language? I assume you refer to the target (JS/V8 versus Java/OpenJDK). In any case the API that Python and Guile would expose would be very similar, so I would think that the feedback on the API doesn't depend much on the extension language. That said, as I get to choose, I choose Guile :) My V8 debugging tools are already in Guile, FWIW. Andy