From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 129635 invoked by alias); 2 Aug 2019 17:27:26 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 129576 invoked by uid 89); 2 Aug 2019 17:27:25 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-10.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=HX-Languages-Length:261 X-HELO: rock.gnat.com Received: from rock.gnat.com (HELO rock.gnat.com) (205.232.38.15) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Fri, 02 Aug 2019 17:27:24 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by filtered-rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8353116AEF; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 13:27:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from rock.gnat.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (rock.gnat.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id ggK-0Sb6ohFc; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 13:27:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from murgatroyd (97-122-178-82.hlrn.qwest.net [97.122.178.82]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by rock.gnat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4025F1169CC; Fri, 2 Aug 2019 13:27:22 -0400 (EDT) From: Tom Tromey To: Tom de Vries Cc: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Tom Tromey Subject: Re: [8.3 backport] Fix crash in cp_print_value_fields References: <20190517201814.27951-1-tromey@adacore.com> <8484cf89-f276-4bed-3fa6-00a21b81ca61@suse.de> Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2019 17:27:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <8484cf89-f276-4bed-3fa6-00a21b81ca61@suse.de> (Tom de Vries's message of "Fri, 2 Aug 2019 17:14:50 +0200") Message-ID: <877e7vfpfq.fsf@tromey.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-SW-Source: 2019-08/txt/msg00050.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Tom" == Tom de Vries writes: Tom> OK to backport to 8.3, as well as the followup patch "Fix two buglets in Tom> cp_print_value_fields patch"? Yes, thank you for doing this. Tom